a research practice working at the intersection of architecture, technology, art and ecological pedagogy

Bateson, Beer and Pask: Emergence of an Eco-Materialist Aesthetics

I will be giving a paper at next year’s Society of Architectural Historians (SAH) conference, which will be in Detroit. My paper abstract is as follows:


Andrew Pickering has noted that “the ontology of cybernetics is a strange and unfamiliar one, very different from that of the modern sciences”. He argues that the modern ideology and practice of science is fundamentally representational, but that within post-war cybernetics there was a radical and marginalised research interest, which staged a non-representational approach, based upon a “hylozoic wonder”, and a “reciprocal coupling of people and things”, and which tried to develop a new philosophy and science of material process. Across an ecology of practices – art, architecture, psychiatry, robotics, biological computing, cognitive science and even management theory – we find in this research the beginnings of a reformulation of the project of western knowledge, and a different way of thinking about what “things” are, and what we can know about them. Binary oppositions that continue to structure much thought, such as matter and pattern, nature and culture, subject and object, were profoundly re-imagined here, not just conceptually, but through real experimental projects.

In this paper I focus on Gregory Bateson’s conceptions of an ecological aesthetics and an ecology of mind, and Stafford Beer and Gordon Pask’s ideas around biological computing. All of these thinkers engaged in architectural or urban issues in various ways. Bateson tried to make available the insights of complex systems theory to NY planners, Pask famously collaborated with Cedric Price, and worked at the AA, whilst Beer fantasised about designing factories that were managed by complex systems in the local environment!

I review these more obvious engagements with architectural and ecological knowledge, but will also ask what kinds of questions and possibilities this neocybernetic research – which staged a very novel conception of time and agency – poses for the practice and knowledge of architectural historiography, an eco-materialist aesthetics and critical-political urban ecology.

Filed under: ecology, research

2 Responses

  1. Steve Valk says:

    Dear X,

    Would like to make contact but could not find your name.
    I am a contemporary dance dramaturge working deeply with
    “neo-cybernetic” ideas and strategies in the social sphere.
    Am a deep admirer of Gregory Bateson`s and have recently discovered the work of Andrew Pickering. This has been a bit of a “godsend” because, as Pickering points out, the ontology of cybernetics is a strange one. Continually feeling the full brunt of these effects can be disheartening. Would like to send you something on “Social Choreography”

    Warm regards,

    Steve Valk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: